USC Upstate
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,313  Jasmine Polite JR 21:53
2,082  Hannah Chaney JR 22:41
2,097  Anastasia Kolesnitchenko SO 22:42
2,265  Erin Gethin JR 22:53
2,642  Molly Bliss SO 23:17
2,851  Ashleigh Torres SO 23:36
2,917  Janay Chisolm FR 23:43
3,001  Nia Payne SO 23:52
3,099  Essence Jackson FR 24:03
3,287  Danielle Horneff SO 24:32
3,415  Sarah Hetzel SO 24:58
National Rank #255 of 340
Southeast Region Rank #36 of 49
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 36th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Jasmine Polite Hannah Chaney Anastasia Kolesnitchenko Erin Gethin Molly Bliss Ashleigh Torres Janay Chisolm Nia Payne Essence Jackson Danielle Horneff Sarah Hetzel
Charlotte Invitational (Green) 09/28 1540 23:15 24:30 24:25 24:27
Charlotte Invitational (Gold) 09/28 1308 22:18 23:09 22:29 22:50 22:59 23:41 23:54
Blue Ridge Open 10/18 1313 21:52 22:38 23:01 22:47 23:28 23:43 24:00 23:26 24:43 25:30
Atlantic Sun Championship 11/02 1298 21:39 22:39 22:35 23:07 23:08 23:48 23:34 24:16 23:46
Southeast Region Championships 11/15 1311 21:53 22:28 22:46 22:48 23:43 23:41 24:05





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 36.3 1091 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.6



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Jasmine Polite 144.1
Hannah Chaney 224.9
Anastasia Kolesnitchenko 225.4
Erin Gethin 239.3
Molly Bliss 261.3
Ashleigh Torres 272.9
Janay Chisolm 277.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 0.0% 0.0 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 0.2% 0.2 29
30 0.2% 0.2 30
31 0.6% 0.6 31
32 1.0% 1.0 32
33 3.0% 3.0 33
34 6.7% 6.7 34
35 15.0% 15.0 35
36 34.5% 34.5 36
37 19.2% 19.2 37
38 10.4% 10.4 38
39 5.0% 5.0 39
40 2.4% 2.4 40
41 1.2% 1.2 41
42 0.4% 0.4 42
43 0.2% 0.2 43
44 44
45 0.0% 0.0 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0